Thor, a He or a She?

Nerds know that he dropped the hammer and she picked it. Comic stories aside, tables turned around, how about a short digression to the classics. Of physics.

Isaac Newton founded classical mechanics on the view that space is distinct from body and that time passes uniformly without regard to whether anything happens in the world. For this reason he spoke of absolute space and absolute time, so as to distinguish these entities from the various ways by which we measure them (which he called relative spaces and relative times).

Look around. Poke a pebble. Hammer that rod. You are living in classical mechanics.

Departing the classics, together with our surroundings, you have a chance of landing here (probably):

In physics, relativistic mechanics refers to mechanics compatible with special relativity (SR) and general relativity (GR). It provides a non-quantum mechanical description of a system of particles, or of a fluid, in cases where the velocities of moving objects are comparable to the speed of light c. As a result, classical mechanics is extended correctly to particles traveling at high velocities and energies, and provides a consistent inclusion of electromagnetism with the mechanics of particles.

Please read the two excerpts once more. The relativistic first, then the classic. In order to shorten this digression, I’ll mention quantum mechanics, and field theory, by ways of a graphic (although they most likely deserve more).


By GYassineMrabetTalk✉This vector image was created with Inkscape. – Self-made based on Physicsdomains.jpg., CC BY-SA 3.0,

Consider that tomorrow (years or decades from this Saturday), human society will accept the postulate that – beyond the relativistic crevices of this observable reality – Sir Isaac Newton is eating an apple. As we speak.

Albert Einstein called the intuitive or metaphoric mind a sacred gift. He added that the rational mind was a faithful servant. It is paradoxical that in the context of modern life we have begun to worship the servant and defile the divine.

A majestic tree falls amidst the Siberian taiga. No one around for miles. No one has seen it. No one has heard it. Does the tree even exist? What is the tree, the land, the space and time, without us, without an observer to see and hear?

A watcher brings the eyes and, with the mind behind them, casts a perspective. As it turns out, few of these are a precise match, when observers share them with one another. That is what axioms and equations are for.

Simpler than math, however, is the second law of man: love your neighbor as you love yourself. Revolving the logic: loathe your neighbor and consequently you’ll loathe yourself.

Dunno if to call this a karmic equation. But it is of essence to notice that for the value of love – or the lack of it – among observers, we’re stuck with the material equivalence: if and only if you love[loathe] the other, then you love[loathe] yourself; if and only if you love[loathe] yourself, then you love[loathe] the other. Middle grounds come and go as illusions. Ghosts of a present tough to grasp, to accept. The roller coaster of relativity runs from point A to point B. Everything in between belongs to illusion. Chimeras that never were and won’t ever be.

If you love yourself, then you know this from loving your neighbor. If you love your neighbor, then you can feel this back on loving yourself.

Knowing this, dare to pick that hammer. It is worth trying.

By the way! Is crossing Bifrost faster than the speed of light? Is Bifrost really about speed? Or a simple iteration?

2 thoughts on “Thor, a He or a She?

  1. Thor can be both…..God wants us to love one another……Doris you are my goddess Thor…..the thoughts you give us to think deeper about life and that sweet smile brings love and caring to all….more people finding this love would make a more peaceful world…..unfortunately am so proud to join you goddess Thor and you loving hubby to hold the hammer to send the love to all we come in contact with.
    Hands together on the hammer

    1. Yes, Bill, as you said, Thor can be both – like in the paradigm that our minds make the future come to fruition. I don’t know half the mechanics mentioned in this post written by hubby. What I do know, as in hearing back from many, is that his computer/network analogies didn’t ping too well with some audiences. To avoid exasperation, due to lack of communication, I sent him back to the 20th Century philosophy books, telling him: “Ya know, those things of paper, with pages, dog ears and dust. Do everyone a favor and skip back to more representative models of speech.” I’m glad that he begins to listen.

      Thanks, Bill, for your lovely comment!
      Doris ❤ 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.