Another Cooling-warming post by guest blogger Ruddy Adam
New Study Concludes That Jiggering the Temperatures is the Only Way the Warmers Can Claim Global Warming, and the Same Study Invalidates Obama’s Radical EPA’s CO2 Endangerment Claims
A 2016 study published June 27 by two scientists and a statistician found that manipulations made to global surface temperature readings by pro-global warming “scientists” in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data. Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever—despite current claims of record setting warming.”
“Climate scientists” have been altering weather temperatures for years, because there are many places on earth that they do not have the ability to obtain an accurate temperature. What they have done in each of those cases in the past has been to set the temperature in accordance with CO2 levels, which makes it look as though any rise in CO2 levels is causing temperatures to rise.
The study also concluded that “the cyclical temperature pattern in the earlier reported data has very nearly been ‘adjusted’ out of temperature readings taken from weather stations, buoys, ships, and other sources.”
In almost every case of temperature jiggering, the surface temperature warming adjustments make past temperatures show cooler and current temperatures show warmer. NASA, NOAA, and IPCC are then able to show a pattern of increased warming, which comes about only by their manipulating the numbers.
“Nearly all of the warming they are now showing are in the adjustments. Each dataset pushed down the 1940s warming and pushed up the current warming.” Stated Meteorologist Joe D’Aleo.
This is the very reason we urge those who are debating the Warmers not to agree with their claim that the planet is warming, mainly because of these manipulations they done to show warming, but also because it’s a good chance that the planet is going through a slight cooling period.
If one agrees with the Warmers’ claim that the planet is, then their only argument is to say, “Oh sure, the planet is warming. It’s just that humans are not causing that warming.” This allows the Warmers to frame the argument, which is something that no experienced debater would ever do.
“You would think that when you make adjustments you’d sometimes get warming and sometimes get cooling. That’s almost never happened,” said D’Aleo, who co-authored the study with statistician James Wallace and Cato Institute climate scientist Craig Idso.
Their study found measurements “nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history,” which was “nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern.”
Finally, the study states that “The conclusive findings of this research are that the three [global temperature] data sets are not a valid representation of reality. In fact, the magnitude of their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”
The researchers conclude that the claims behind Obama’s EPA to give itself authority to regulate what the Warmers call “greenhouse gases” “is invalidated.”
The study will be included in petitions by groups challenging the Obama EPA’s 2009 endangerment finding, which gave itself the “legal authority to regulate carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.”
Because President Trump ordered his EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt to review the Clean Power Plan, those who know that the radical Warmers’ claims of a dangerously warming planet are phony to the point of being a hoax are hoping that Pruitt will openly put the Obama EPA’s claim of endangerment to the scrutiny it deserves.
The Obama EPA document used three lines of evidence to claim emissions from vehicles “endanger both the public health and the public welfare of current and future generations,” by warming the planet and causing climate change.
D’Aleo and Wallace have filed a petition with the EPA charging that one of Obama’s EPA “lines of evidence simply does not exist in the real world.”
This study, nor no other one that takes into account the temperature rigging, has shown that rising CO2 levels have anything other than a tiny fraction of an impact on global temperatures.
In fact, it has been the contention of our group for years that the claims of rising CO2 levels should be checked by unbiased researchers; and this so far has not been carried out. Until such work is carried out, we recommend everyone use their own level of skepticism regarding CO2 level claims, because we are caught taking the word of people who need global warming to be true to justify their jobs.
For that reason, in our view, the temptation for reporting due to an ulterior motive is too great to accept their claims willy-nilly.
The researchers conclude that, “In summary, all three of the lines of evidence relied upon by the EPA to attribute warming to human GHG emissions are invalid. The Endangerment Finding itself is therefore invalid and should be reconsidered.”
For the entire study see here: