Little We Know

Colonel S. delights us again with more of an old scam. Plus the storm on Saturn.

NOAA Caught Fixing Temperature Numbers to Match Their Global Warming Claims

What NOAA is doing is what is called “fixing the data to match theory.” Mr. President ought to call for an investigation of this deceit. He probably does not know it’s going on. That’s the problem. The system managers have him in a bubble exactly where they want him. They started this with Reagan and then fed him the news they wanted him to see and the articles they wanted him to read. These often changed his mind to match the Eastern Establishment RINOs’ positions.

Here is the real smoking gun of fraud by NOAA. The adjustments being made almost perfectly match atmospheric CO2 levels – showing that the data is being altered precisely to match global warming theory.

The NOAA data tampering produces a spectacular hockey stick of scientific fraud, which becomes the basis of vast amounts of downstream junk climate science. Pre-2000 temperatures are progressively cooled, and post-2000 temperatures are warmed. This year has been a particularly spectacular episode of data tampering by NOAA, as they introduce nearly 2.5 degrees of fake warming since 1895.

Most of these adjustments are due to simply making up data. Every month, a certain percentage of the 1,218 United States Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) stations fail to report their data, and the temperature gets estimated by NOAA using a computer model. Missing data is marked in the USHCN database with an “E” – meaning “estimated.” In 1970, about 10% of the data was missing, but that number has increased to almost 50%, meaning that almost half of the current adjusted data is fake.

The fabricated temperatures have warmed four degrees since 1970, relative to the adjusted temperatures which were based on actual station data. This shows that the warming trend in the US claimed by NOAA is based on computer models, not actual thermometer data or even adjusted thermometer data.

Mission accomplished: Fixing the data to match theory.

Always for full exposure of every bureaucracy, Col. S.

PS: Regarding NASA and NOAA’s sea ice levels.

NOAA claims they don’t have satellite sea ice data before 1979, but they are lying. The 1990 IPCC report showed NOAA satellite data back to 1973, which was much lower than 1979. Which means that sea ice increased over those six years.

The truth is, there is reasonably good ice data going back to the 1920’s, which shows that ice extent was very low in the 1940’s and 1950’s. No, the polar ice caps are not melting, and there is not less sea ice than there was 40 years ago.

Info gathered from Real Climate Science.

Don’s parallel rantings from tonight.

This on Earth. Now have a look at a global weather phenomenon in the upper atmosphere of Saturn

A storm catching up itself in circles, could this be caused by a bolide?

And listen to these two guys here

Currently, mainstream calls this a huge storm. Not that it isn’t a huge storm. Just wondering what makes the storm look like a bullet trailing through butter? Or, to leave the metaphor behind, the contrail of a meteorite, such as this Russian Meteorite’s Fiery Entry Captured by Satellites.

What if a larger bolide did not enter the atmosphere of Saturn, rather gaining momentum to exit it?
Little we know.

Saturn’s stratospheric storm – what if a solid object circling at high speeds causes this?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.