What is tunneling? Besides the underground dug passage, it may also be one or more of the following.

Tunneling (of a particle) pass through a potential barrier.

Tunneling is a protocol that allows for the secure movement of data from one network to another. Tunneling involves allowing private network communications to be sent across a public network, such as the Internet, through a process called encapsulation.

In one word, tunneling is a connection of trust.

In 1831, when Michael Faraday discovered electromagnetic induction, the establishment had yet to come to terms with this old, yet invisible, law of nature.

“Who would not have been laughed at if he had said in 1800 that metals could be extracted from their ores by electricity or that portraits could be drawn by chemistry.

{Commenting on Henri Becquerel’s process for extracting metals by voltaic means.}”
― Michael Faraday, The Letters of Faraday and Schoenbein, 1836-1862, with Notes, Comments and References to Contemporary Letters

“If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.”
― Nikola Tesla

A statement, any statement, can be correct yet never complete. Perhaps that what completes a statement is the context. Let’s consider this one.

“Communism is Soviet government plus the electrification of the whole country. Otherwise the country will remain a country of small peasant economy, and it is up to us to realize this quite clearly.”

New External and Internal Position and the Problems of the Party (1920); as quoted in The Soviet Power : The Socialist Sixth Of The World (1940) by Hewlett Johnson.

Now, take your engineering hat, check on today’s Google earth, contextualize back to the 1920s and contemplate drawing the blueprints of spreading electricity -free as in communism- to some village in Yakutia. Could you, in all your mental faculties, consider wiring the Taiga under a grid? They’ve got enough issues keeping the Trans-Siberian railway from Moscow to Vladivostok – on a single line – together.

You may say that Lenin was a lunatic. A reptilian he was, yet not a paranoid lunatic like Stalin. Betting half of communism on electricity makes him an avid reader of Jules Verne, a casual student of Tesla and a progressive swindler with an eye for science and technology. All you need to get this is placing yourself in the context of electricity one hundred years ago. Before Edison winning his corporate slander wars. Before Ford forcing the gas engine over the world.

Lenin could have toyed with the concept of delivering wireless power to the people. Only this would make any sense out of a 1920 discourse on electrifying all of Russia. As simple as that. Same as Clinton and Al Gore ‘inventing’ the internet, according to popular culture. There is no relation between (on one hand) Michael Faraday, Nikola Tesla, Kristian Birkeland and other electrical scientists and engineers, and (on the other hand) Lenin and the Soviets. There is no relation between (on one hand) Tim Berners-Lee, Vint Cerf, Robert Kahn and other internet pioneers, and (on the other hand) the politicians exploiting, or selling, the world wide web to the masses – from Bill Clinton to Bulgarian President Parvanov awarding them various sorts of medals and orders so they can get a photo op together.

Alternative history endures as a card unplayed. In this reality. Rayguns, particle beams and other weapons, that you’ve seen in sci-fi movies, as fiction, are only part of a secret history, of an untold reality. Because, you know, man was not called to invent, just to observe. Adam did not invent a thing, he was only giving names to creatures that had been brought before him, so he can observe them. Which begs the question: if your mind imagined this or that but if your narrative can fancy only stuff that actually exists, somewhere somehow closer or farther from your eyes and ears, then your dream can be someone’s existence. What looks symbolic here can very well be literal there.

Wireless power to the people opens a few existential gates: where the power comes from?, the air, the cosmos, the universe? No central power plant, no central committee, no secretary general, no boss? So this makes it endless, inexhaustible, yet also non manageable, non tractable. The government allowing such a give away will disappear in little time, wasted by the spirit of the open prairies, eventually reduced to domestic regulatory tasks. No government, no institution, religious or secular, would exercise control over literally empowered people. For better or for worse, the laws of the jungle, the tribal monkey wars, would be carried out with death rays, to outer space.

This being a justification, not completely baseless, of a need for secrecy. The question that begs from here is: who is the authority to tell who’s a tribal monkey and who is not, inside or outside any secret project.

Einstein’s relativity is a decoy, ignore that, unlearn it if you wish to understand that what they sell you as fiction today is closer to science than twisted claims by academia. However, because of disinformation and ridicule, things that matter are yet to be taken seriously.

Let’s move the context further back in time. If we ought to place Paul in the context of the year 62AD, in Asia Minor / present day Turkey, where the verb ‘is’ meant ‘is’ as it should today, then we must place Ruddy in another context, of the 20th century, atheistic earth, believing in bogus relativistic ignorance, where ‘is’ could mean ‘represent’ or as the quote goes.

Contending that his statement that “there’s nothing going on between us” had been truthful because he had no ongoing relationship with Lewinsky at the time he was questioned, Clinton said, “It depends upon what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.

This because words like ‘matter’ or ‘materializing’ mean little to this era, somehow like Michael Faraday had been a sorcerer to an audience who could only understand the hammer on the nail or the pull on the rope as actions in the nature of things.

On the linguistic side of the Letter, Paul also uses some fine figures of speech, and as always, he places some parallelism in, along with some beautiful rhetoric, such as “the eyes in the heart,” and a perfect metaphor when he writes that Khrist’s Body “is the Divine Assembly,” which means that “Khrist’s Body represents the Divine Assembly.”

In the last figure, we have the word “Body” put for all Khristians (metonymy) and the statement that the One Thing (the Body) is the Other (the Divine Assembly), making for a perfectly beautiful metaphor, which is when one thing is stated to be another that it cannot realistically be, such as when we are told that the bread we eat for Communion is the Lord’s Body, which means by the use of metaphor that the bread represents His Body. The same goes for the wine and His Blood: the wine represents His Blood.

Nine Verses of Paul’s Letter

People may be ignorant not only of figures of speech, but also of tunneling.

Khrist’s Body is the Divine Assembly – to some this statement is not just a metaphor, but a fact. I believe in more than one reality, therefore my realistic approach is broader, including the bread and wine that are transsubstantiated into the Body and Blood of Iisus Xristos. This is no metaphor to me. But nature, regardless of what others may deem to be realistic or not.

Back to Einstein, they state that light [which they do not differentiate] has a speed limit [some kind of light, not any kind of light] in void [ignore the aether] and because of this limit, the signal, or the ship, would need thousands and thousands of earth-years to travel from star to star. Dare to contradict these postulations and you get in big trouble with academia. Meanwhile, the military beams stuff up and down, transits portals back and forth, keeping quite busy to exploit another physics, another nature, that hasn’t been sanctioned [yet] for public consumption. Metaphors and figures of speech aside, little we know about what is done, actually, under our noses.

And if the military can do a fraction of all the above, then most likely that God can tunnel a slice of Jesus’ heart into a slice of bread, and bring up a glass of wine into His blood, on demand. After all, if all this universe is a simulation, if God plays a game of worlds, we are the metaphors here, our breads and wines suspended parables, until one deems to ask for them to turn real: into heart and blood of the Real One.

John 6:53-58
53. Jesus, therefore, said to them, ‘Verily, verily, I say to you, If ye may not eat the flesh of the Son of Man, and may not drink his blood, ye have no life in yourselves;
54. he who is eating my flesh, and is drinking my blood, hath life age-during, and I will raise him up in the last day;
55. for my flesh truly is food, and my blood truly is drink;
56. he who is eating my flesh, and is drinking my blood, doth remain in me, and I in him.
57. ‘According as the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, he also who is eating me, even that one shall live because of me;
58. this is the bread that came down out of the heaven; not as your fathers did eat the manna, and died; he who is eating this bread shall live — to the age.’

Photo by Richard Gatley on Unsplash

Further on stuffs that matter, this time in another quite retro context, with acronyms and all that, suitable for this May 4th day of science fiction, let’s indulge in watching this not so short presentation. Patience beyond minute 30 may bring unexpected rewards. Enjoy and keep tunneling – nothing to fear!

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

Arthur Schopenhauer

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.